Coalition's gas plan would help fewer than 1% of manufacturing workers, report finds
Exclusive
: Grattan Institute contradicts PM’s suggestion gas would be key to post-Covid
economic recovery
Fewer
than 1% of Australian manufacturing jobs are in gas-intensive industries that would
materially benefit from a massive gas industry expansion proposed by the
Morrison government, according to an upcoming analysis.
A report
by the Grattan Institute, to be released in November, examines the number of
manufacturing businesses and jobs across the country that are heavily reliant
on gas.
Its
results contradict a suggestion
by Scott Morrison that gas could be central to plans to re-establish a
strong economy after the coronavirus recession.
In
a speech
in the Hunter Valley on Tuesday, the prime minister announced $52.9m
for plans to increase gas supply and transportation infrastructure, and issued
an ultimatum to electricity generators, warning taxpayers would build a gas
power plant if the private sector did not.
Morrison
said a gas expansion would be particularly important for the manufacturing
sector, which he said employed more than
850,000 Australians. He quoted a gas industry estimate that 225,000
manufacturing jobs were in industries that relied heavily on gas and needed a
cheap, reliable supply.
The
Grattan Institute, a Melbourne-based thinktank, found about two-thirds of the
gas used in manufacturing was consumed at just 15 facilities that together
employ just over 10,000 people.
Gas was
found on average to make up at least 10% of the input costs at those
facilities, where it is used as a feedstock and fuel source to make plastics,
alumina and products based on ammonia and other chemicals. They are owned by
just nine companies, including Qenos, Rio Tinto, Alcoa, Orica and Incitec
Pivot.
Across
the rest of the manufacturing sector the cost of gas was found to be less than
0.5% of total inputs.
Guy
Dundas, an energy fellow with the institute, said nearly 6,000 of the
manufacturing jobs that were heavily reliant on gas already had an affordable
supply as they were based in Western Australia, where the price was about $4 a
gigajoule – roughly half that being offered in contracts on the east coast.
He said
there were only between 4,000 and 5,000 jobs in heavily gas-reliant manufacturing
in the east, which was a focus of the prime minister’s announcement.
Tony
Wood, the Grattan Institute’s energy director, said the analysis showed the
idea the government could stimulate a gas-led recovery was “unlikely at several
levels”.
“Gas prices
are unlikely to be very low again, and even if they were low they would not
create serious economic stimulus because seriously gas-reliant industries don’t
employ many people,” he said.
Wood
noted the jobs lost during the recession were largely in retail, entertainment
and hospitality, not energy and manufacturing, and said a gas expansion would
require the government to back the sort of proposals recommended in a leaked
draft report by a manufacturing taskforce, including significant
taxpayer underwriting of new gas infrastructure and involvement in developing
gasfields.
“Even if
the government is prepared to subsidise the entire industry, that would have
limited impact. That would seem an extraordinary proposition, and it doesn’t
seem to be going down that path,” Wood said.
He said
the economic argument against a major gas expansion was also undermined by
the trend
towards adopting cheaper clean energy. Gas has about half the carbon dioxide
emissions of coal when burned, but its impact on the climate is greater once
leakage of methane, a relatively short-lived but highly potent greenhouse
gas, is
factored in.
The
government’s gas strategy includes the option of taxpayer underwriting
for priority gas projects and the construction of a gas power station in the
Hunter Valley if the private sector failed to replace the ageing Liddell coal
plant in 2023.
Morrison
last week said the government estimated “some 1,000 megawatts” of new
dispatchable electricity was needed to keep prices down after Liddell’s
closure, but on Sunday he gave
the ABC an updated estimate of “about 250 MW, or thereabouts”.
Analysis released by the government has not
included either estimate.
The idea
of a gas-led recovery has been championed
by the government’s business advisers, including Nev Power, the former
Fortescue executive, and Andrew Liveris, a former Dow Chemical executive and
current Saudi Aramco board member.
In
a speech
last week, Liveris declared Australia could hit net zero emissions by 2050
by significantly expanding supply and use of gas even though it would release
heat-trapping emissions. Liveris compared the opportunity to develop gas in
Australia with that in the US, where fracking for shale gas has led to a comparatively
cheap supply.
Wood said
there was little evidence gas prices would stay low in Australia, or that lower
prices would drive an expansion of manufacturing. Manufacturing was not
expanding on the Australian east coast before prices rose significantly last
decade, and manufacturing businesses were not substantially investing in
Western Australia now, despite low prices there.
Gas
prices on the east coast roughly tripled for some users, from about $4 to about
$12 a gigajoule, after an export hub opened in Queensland in 2014. About
three-quarters of the gas produced is sold overseas and the domestic gas price
has been effectively set by the Asian market.
A recent
report by
the consumer watchdog said there was evidence some contract prices for
2021 had fallen to less than $7 in Queensland and between $7 and $8 in southern
states, but many business were still buying gas for between $9 and $11, more
than twice the historic price.
Dundas
said the report would also make clear gas basins being considered for
development on the east coast contained a dry type of gas that was not suitable
for many types of manufacturing that had increased in the US in recent years.
The Narrabri
gasfield in New South Wales and the Bowen and Galilee basins in
Queensland contained little ethane, which is an important feedstock in complex
chemical processes to create plastics. It would be suitable for production of
ammonia-based fertilisers and explosives.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire